Gaitway Chiropractic
  • Spokane Wellness Home
  • Meet the Doctor
  • Conditions We Treat
    • Low Back Pain
    • Neck Pain
  • New Patients
  • New Patient intake form
  • Appointment Request
  • Insurance
  • Blog
  • Spokane Wellness Home
  • Meet the Doctor
  • Conditions We Treat
    • Low Back Pain
    • Neck Pain
  • New Patients
  • New Patient intake form
  • Appointment Request
  • Insurance
  • Blog

"Bridge the gap between injury and performance"

Ankle sprain? A bit of understanding and rehab strategies.

1/27/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Did you just sprain your ankle? I did recently. It hurts! Ankle sprains occur so often that sometimes it can be easy to overlook helpful treatment strategies to accelerate the healing because, well, they will heal on their own, right?

Ankle sprains are the most common lower extremity injury in sport. The most common is an inversion sprain where the foot rolls under the inside portion of the ankle. There are eversion sprains and diastasis (aka "high ankle") sprains, but these are less common. ​

Read More
0 Comments

4 ways to naturally boost the immune system that doesn't involve diet and nutrition.

12/18/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Now more than ever it seems the world wants effective means by which to naturally boost the immune system. We've already learned a lot about what strengthen our immunity before this pandemic and even more afterwards.

What we know is that functional impairment of antigen-specific T cells is a hallmark of chronic infections and viral disease. 

There are many considerations for boosting immunity and T cell function. Supplements most notable for this are:
  • Vitamin D3 with K2
  • magnesium
  • zinc
  • selenium
  • melatonin
In addition to supplementation, staying hydrated and eating well are usually the first things people think about when wanting to boost their immune system. I mean, you are what you eat right. But what ways naturally boost the immune system that goes beyond what you put in your mouth? Here are 4 ways to boost the immune system naturally that doesn't involve diet and nutrition:

  1. Reduce stress - when your mental health is attacked, inflammation is seen throughout the body because of your hormonal response to cortisol. Chronic inflammation causes an imbalance in cell function and can lead to illness and disease. Managing your stress levels by practicing mindfulness techniques, speaking to a licensed counselor, journaling your thoughts, socializing with friends, receiving a massage, reading a book, reducing screen time,  or enjoying a favorite activity can all help keep your immune system functioning properly.(1,2,3)
  2. Restful sleep - most of us have experienced a time in our life when we consistently got less and less sleep and were more prone to getting sick. Adequate rest will significantly impact the ability to fight illness and infections. Our bodies need sleep to recover from everyday stressors, whether that be mental or physical. Aim for 7 hours of actual sleep time if you are an adult, 8-10 hours for adolescents, and 14 hours for young children and infants. (4,5,6)
  3. Exercise - moderate intensity exercise will place a healthy amount of oxidative stress on your body that causing your immune system to adapt over time to this stress and slowly strength immune cellular function. It can be tricky because chronic high-intensity exercise can also cause enough stress to the immune system resulting in an unfavorable outcome of suppressing the immune system. Brisk walking regularly is one of the most often studied forms of exercise that shows consistent results for boosting the immune system. (7,8,9)
  4. Chiropractic adjustments - okay this one I'm certain I will need research to support. Last thing I need is someone saying I said Chiropractic adjustments cure COVID-19. I am not saying that. In no way shape or form am I suggesting that chiropractic can cure, treat, prevent, or mitigate COVID-19 because the evidence to substantiate such a claim does not exist. The practice of chiropractic however focuses on the relationship between structure (primarily the spine) and function (as coordinated by the nervous system) and how that relationship affects the preservation and restoration of health.  There is a growing body of evidence showing a positive relationship between the chiropractic adjustments, the nervous system and the immune system. (10,11,12,13,14,15)

​Want more tips and tricks on keeping your body healthy and strong? Hit us up at Gaitway Chiropractic @ Spokane Wellness in Spokane, Wa. 509-466-1366
Request an appointment now!
References:
  1. ​​Dhabhar FS. Effects of stress on immune function: the good, the bad, and the beautiful. Immunol Res. 2014 May;58(2-3):193-210. doi: 10.1007/s12026-014-8517-0. PMID: 24798553.
  2. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Doyle WJ, Miller GE, Frank E, Rabin BS, Turner RB. Chronic stress, glucocorticoid receptor resistance, inflammation, and disease risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):5995-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118355109. Epub 2012 Apr 2. PMID: 22474371; PMCID: PMC3341031.
  3. ​Carlsson E, Frostell A, Ludvigsson J, Faresjö M. Psychological stress in children may alter the immune response. J Immunol. 2014 Mar 1;192(5):2071-81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301713. Epub 2014 Feb 5. PMID: 24501202.
  4. Prather AA, Janicki-Deverts D, Hall MH, Cohen S. Behaviorally Assessed Sleep and Susceptibility to the Common Cold. Sleep. 2015 Sep 1;38(9):1353-9. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4968. PMID: 26118561; PMCID: PMC4531403.
  5. Besedovsky L, Lange T, Haack M. The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease. Physiol Rev. 2019 Jul 1;99(3):1325-1380. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00010.2018. PMID: 30920354; PMCID: PMC6689741.
  6. Nagai N, Ayaki M, Yanagawa T, Hattori A, Negishi K, Mori T, Nakamura TJ, Tsubota K. Suppression of Blue Light at Night Ameliorates Metabolic Abnormalities by Controlling Circadian Rhythms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Sep 3;60(12):3786-3793. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27195. PMID: 31504080.
  7. ​Simpson RJ, Kunz H, Agha N, Graff R. Exercise and the Regulation of Immune Functions. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;135:355-80. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 5. PMID: 26477922.
  8. Abd El-Kader SM, Al-Shreef FM. Inflammatory cytokines and immune system modulation by aerobic versus resisted exercise training for elderly. Afr Health Sci. 2018 Mar;18(1):120-131. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i1.16. PMID: 29977265; PMCID: PMC6016983.
  9. ​Khosravi N, Stoner L, Farajivafa V, Hanson ED. Exercise training, circulating cytokine levels and immune function in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2019 Oct;81:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.08.187. Epub 2019 Aug 24. PMID: 31454519.
  10. Fidelibus, J.C., An overview of neuroimmunomodulation and a possible correlation with musculoskeletal system function. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1989. 12(4): p. 289-92.
  11. Teodorczyk-Injeyan, J.A., H.S. Injeyan, and R. Ruegg, Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2006. 29(1): p. 14-21.
  12. Lohman, E.B., et al., The immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation on pain and biochemical markers in females with acute non-specific mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther, 2019. 27(4): p. 186-196.
  13. Teodorczyk-Injeyan, J.A., et al., Elevated Production of Nociceptive CC Chemokines and sE-Selectin in Patients With Low Back Pain and the Effects of Spinal Manipulation: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain, 2018. 34(1): p. 68-75.
  14. Kovanur-Sampath, K., et al., Changes in biochemical markers following spinal manipulation-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract, 2017. 29: p. 120-131.
  15. Teodorczyk-Injeyan, J.A., et al., Enhancement of in vitro interleukin-2 production in normal subjects following a single spinal manipulative treatment. Chiropr Osteopat, 2008. 16: p. 5. 
​Disclaimer
The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
0 Comments

What conservative treatments for pain do Chiropractors and physical therapist typically use?

12/18/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Effective conservative treatments for musculoskeletal related pain that you will most often find in the chiropractic or physical therapy clinic include:
  • Spinal manipulative therapy (AKA "an adjustment") - this involves the application of accurately determined and specifically directed manual forces to the body with the intent to improve mobility in areas that are restricted whether the restrictions are within joints, in connective tissues, or in skeletal muscles. 
  • Soft tissue therapy (AKA "massage") - though massage is commonly interchanged with soft tissue therapy the two are not synonymous. This involves some form of hands on or instrument-assisted means of improving the flexibility of soft tissues; things like, muscles, tendons, ligaments, fascia, skin, etc.
  • Traction - this involves mechanical stretching apart of two structures over either a short or long period of time with the intent to decrease contracture, improve disc fluid absorption, reduce muscle spasm, increase nerve root canal size, and increase circulation to the nerve root and spine.
  • Hydrotherapy (AKA "hot and cold") - this involves the direct application of heat or cold, usually ice,  to allow for pain relief, blood vessel changes, reduced inflammation and increase relaxation. The clinical effectiveness of operating temperatures for heat is 140°-160° Fahrenheit and for cold is 50°-60° Fahrenheit.
  • Functional Strength Training (AKA "FST") - this is the means of engaging the body in a variety of strength challenges in multiple positions to effective train the small stabilization muscles as well as the large primary movement muscles to improve movement patterns, increase tissue load capacity making them more resilient to injury, and reduce muscle imbalances.
  • Low Level Light Therapy (AKA "laser" or LLLT) - this is a fast-growing technology used to treat a multitude of conditions that require stimulation of healing, relief of pain and inflammation, and restoration of function. Typical it is achieved using red and near-infrared wavelengths.
  • Ultrasound - this incorporates soundwaves through a patient's skin and tissues to reduce adhesions, fibrosis, and increase molecular and fluid movement. It can also be used to administer therapeutic topical agents to deliver benefits directly to the local injured tissue.
  • Electrotherapy - this can include a variety of treatments such as electrical muscle stimulation (EMS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), diathermy (microwave), interferential electrical currents, low volt and high volt galvanic currents, and microcurrents. All of these have different clinical outcome goals in mind but generally the target goal is increased tissue healing, pain relief, muscle relaxation, decreased swelling, and decreased inflammation.
Of course, there exists other conservative treatment options like nutritional needs analysis, topical analgesics, acupuncture, brain based therapy, hypobaric oxygen therapy, etc. However, the list above is what most often what a Chiropractor or physical therapist might recommend to you. Before you decide which treatment or combination of treatments you decide to go with, it is important for you to be an equal team member in the decision making process of your own health.

Want tips and tricks on getting rid of headaches, back pain, neck pain, shoulder pain, hip pain, knee pain for good?
​
Hit us up at Gaitway Chiropractic at Spokane Wellness in Spokane, Wa.
509-466-1366
Request an appointment now!
Disclaimer
The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
0 Comments

What is deep referred pain?

12/17/2020

1 Comment

 
Picture
Deep referred pain is also called "scleratogenous" referred pain and is far more likely a cause of symptoms referring down a patient's arms or legs than is a true nerve root or "radicular" problem. We also call deep referred pain "somatic referred pain" where the "soma" or body tissues like muscles, bone, joint, ligaments, skin and fascia.

Once a trained clinician in the area of pain has ruled out central and peripheral nerve damage, their consideration of a patient's pain source causing referral should be that of joints, ligaments, or muscles. This is the most common scenario. The cause of this type of referred pain comes from our understanding of a patient's modulation of pain perception. There are several proposed theories for referred pain including:
  1. pain signaling received at the spinal cord - this includes concepts such as the Convergent-Projection Theory, the Convergent-Facilitation Theory (AKA central sensitization), the Axon-Reflex Theory, and the Hyperexcitability Theory. In these cases pain can be perceived and inhibited or excited at the level of the backside of the spinal cord.  This can alter the pathway of pain that an individual feels in response in a painful stimulus.
  2. pain signaling received in the brain - prevailing theories here include the Gate Control Theory, Central Modulation Theory and the Thalamic-Convergence Theory where pain can be modified by higher cortical centers in the  brain allowing for either inhibition or excited pain pathways to an individual's response to pain.

Examples of a patient's deep referred, "somatic" or "scleratogenous", referred pain that is most commonly seen with spinal related complaints could be from things like:
  • Facet syndrome - joints of the spine are often called the facet joint. They may be injured by trauma, be that small or large, sustained postural loads, or simple activities of daily living that overload the facet load capacity. This can lead to pain inputs affecting some of the theories explained above, especially in chronic examples of facet syndrome. 
  • Intervertebral disc injury - common causes of pain, especially in the region of the low back, is annular fiber tears of the intervertebral discs. This can occur even if there is no herniation into the spinal canal. Tears or local swelling can stimulate pain receptors in the spine and brain that, once again, can affect the theory of referred pain as explained above.
  • Joint Dysfunction - because of their relationship to facets and discs, joints are considered capable of creating local and radiating symptoms similar to described above. Pain referral patterns in the thoracic spine and between the shoulder blades have often referred pain into the chest especially during activities in which the hands are held out in front of the body.
  • Myofascial pain syndromes - trigger points can cause referred pain, numbness, or even paresthesia (a change in the normal sensation one feels in the skin) along the arm and legs. For instance, a common deep referred pain like this is seen in the shoulder. Trigger points in the rotator cuff muscles (e.g., supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor) can project pain into the arms.

Though describing the concept of deep referred pain as above may make it sound simple and easy to comprehend, the truth is that deep referred pain can overlap considerably with other clinical pain presentations and differentiation may be difficult. A way to remember "scleratogenous" pain is that it may be:
  • Deep
  • Dull
  • Achy
  • Hard to localize
  • Diffuse

Want tips and tricks on getting rid of deep referred pain for good? Request an appointment now.
​
Request an appointment now!
Disclaimer
The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
1 Comment

82.2% of COVID-19 patients tested were found to be deficient in...

11/9/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
The research linking Vitamin D deficiency and the effects of COVID-19 along with the severity of COVID-19 outcomes and treatment with vitamin D is mounting up.

We told you about a pilot study a while back that was released in August 2020 to assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D3).

The highlights of this study indicated that the vitamin D endocrine system may have a variety of actions on cells and tissues involved in COVID-19 progression and that the administration of calcifediol or 25-hydroxyvitamin D to hospitalized COVID-19 patients significantly reduced their need for Intensive Care United admission. (Castillo et al 2020).

Vitamin D seems to be able to reduce severity of the disease.

But wait, there's more.

Researchers in Spain found that 82.2% of COVID-19 patients tested were found to be deficient in vitamin D. (Hernández et al 2020)

Aside from the impact of insulin resistance on the severity of COVID-19 outcomes, Vitamin D deficiency is emerging as a primary risk factor for the severity of COVID-19 infections. 

It would be foolish to not consider assessing one's current serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and determining the best supplementation to address increasing that level over time. 

For instance, for an individual weighing 185 lbs that was categorized at a high risk for viral infection with low vitamin D levels in the blood measuring at 10 ng/ml and wished to increase their amount to a high vitamin D level of 60 ng/ml in order to lower their risk of infection, that person would need a supplementation amount of: 10000 IU* per day (more than their current intake) to be sufficient  to achieve the recommended target serum level of 60 ng/ml. *Values rounded to the nearest 1000 IU

Vitamin D plays a significant role in our health. It can reduce the survival and replication of viruses, reduce cellular inflammation, maintain vascular integrity by effecting vascular inflammation and clotting factors, reduce blood pressure by it's role in the conversion of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, lower cancer risk, improve bone and connective tissue healing, decrease risk of autoimmune disease, and more.

To optimize vitamin D absorption and utilization, be sure to take your vitamin D with vitamin K2 and magnesium. A person supplementing Vitamin D for the hope to raise serum blood levels should retest their serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) every three to four months. 

References:
Castillo M.E., Entrenas Costa L.M., Vaquero Barrios J.M., Alcalá Díaz J.F., Miranda J.L., Bouillon R., Quesada Gomez J.M. Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020;203:105751. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2020.105751

José L Hernández, Daniel Nan, Marta Fernandez-Ayala, Mayte García-Unzueta, Miguel A Hernández-Hernández, Marcos López-Hoyos, Pedro Muñoz Cacho, José M Olmos, Manuel Gutiérrez-Cuadra, Juan J Ruiz-Cubillán, Javier Crespo, Víctor M Martínez-Taboada, Vitamin D Status in Hospitalized Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, , dgaa733, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa733
0 Comments

​Immune Health – Cold and Flu Support

10/22/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
With COVID-19 still on the table and the upcoming seasonal occurrences of cold and flu, targeting the immune system and improving one's overall wellness is critical. The right vitality and nutrition plan during this time has the potential to help decrease the frequency, severity, or duration of cold and flu symptoms.

We can decrease this risk with:
  1. nutrition
  2. supplementation
  3. sleep
  4. exercise
  5. stress management

This is even more important for high-risk populations, such as the elderly, those who are overweight, those with diabetes and other comorbidities causing compromised immune systems.

Want tips and tricks on keeping your body strong during this upcoming cold and flu season? Are you sick now and wish you were more prepared to fight off the cold or flu virus so you can more quickly return to what you enjoy? Then follow along with this protocol developed using only quality evidence.

The following protocol and ingredients below are a reflection of what current research findings show support for when trying to prevent or treat the immune system affecting by cold and flu viruses.

Vitamin C

Adults: 1 g daily as an ongoing maintenance dose3,4, or 3 to 4 g daily at the onset of symptoms and for the duration of illness2,4
Children: 1 to 2 g daily as an ongoing maintenance dose4,2
  • Reduces the duration of the common cold by approximately a half-day2, or by 8% in adults and by 14-18% in children4
  • Reduces time of confinement by approximately six hours and fever duration by approximately a half-day, relieves chest pain and chills by approximately eight hours when given an extra therapeutic dose at the time of onset of cold2
  • Improves antimicrobial and natural killer (NK) cell activities, lymphocyte levels, chemotaxis, delayed T cell responses, sympathetic nervous response, and induces anti-reactive oxygen species activity2
  • Decreased duration of cold by 59% and increased weekly activity levels by 39.5% when compared to placebo in otherwise healthy adult males3

Zinc
75-100 mg of elemental zinc as zinc acetate or zinc gluconate lozenges, once per day, within 24 hours of the onset of common cold symptoms, minimum 1 to 2 weeks cold15,16,17,18,19
  • Reduces cold duration by 33%15, or by approximately 1.65 to 3 days in healthy adults cold16,17,18,20,21
  • Zinc acetate equivalently reduces the duration by 40% and zinc gluconate reduces the duration by 28%15, while other sources indicate greater efficacy with zinc acetate in healthy adults20 
  • Reduces the incidence of cold symptoms after 5-7 days in healthy adults and children19,21
  • Reduces the duration of muscle soreness by 54%, cough by 46%, voice hoarseness by 43%, nasal congestion by 37%, nasal discharge by 34%, scratchy throat by 33%, sneezing by 22%, and sore throat by 18% in healthy adults19,21
  • Reduces the incidence of common cold development, absence from school, and antibiotic use in children1,17
  • Improves anti-inflammatory and antioxidant profile via reductions in plasma interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), TNF-ɑ, MDA, HAE, and 8-oHdG, and increases in IL-2 mRNA in mononuclear cells in healthy adults21,22
  • Reduces duration of symptoms particularly when given within the first 24 hours of symptom onset1,23

Probiotics
Probiotics may reduce the incidence of colds with minor effects on prevention, as well as improve influenza vaccination efficacy for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains, but is dependent on strain and population.24,25,26
Pediatric: 
Common Cold
  • 5 billion CFU of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (ATCC 700396), twice per day, minimum 6 months27
    • Reduces the incidence of fever by 53%, cough by 41%, and antibiotic use by 68%
    • Reduces the duration of fever, coughing, and rhinorrhea by 32%
    • Reduces days absent from childcare by 32%
Influenza
  • 10 billion CFU of Bifidobacterium animalis subs. lactis Bi-07 (ATCC PTA-4802) & Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (ATCC 700396), twice per day for 6 months27
    • Reduces the incidence of fever by 73%, rhinorrhea by 73%, cough by 62%, and antibiotic use by 84%
    • Reduces the duration of fever, coughing, and rhinorrhea by 48%
    • Reduces days absent from childcare by 28%
Adult:
Common Cold
  • 1 billion CFU of Lactobacillus paracasei 8700:2 (DSM 13434) & Lactobacillus plantarum HEAL 9 (DSM 15312), once per day for 3 months28
    • Reduces the incidence of developing more than one common cold episode and number of days with a cold
    • Reduces total symptom scores & pharyngeal symptoms of cold
    • Reduces B lymphocyte proliferation
Influenza
  • 10 billion CFU of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716, once per day for 2 weeks before influenza vaccination and two weeks after29
    • Reduces the incidence of influenza 5-months after vaccination compared to vaccine alone
    • Increases natural killer cells, T-helper response, and IgA levels
  • 10 billion CFU of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, twice per day for 4 weeks after influenza vaccination30
    • Increases seroprotection for the H3N2 strain during the supplementation period
  • 500 mg of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EpiCor®), once per day for 12 weeks31,32
    • Reduces the incidence of cold/flu symptoms with or without prior vaccination
    • Reduces the duration of symptoms with prior vaccination

Echinacea purpurea
Prevention: 0.9 mL, three times per day (equivalent to 2400 mg of extract), minimum 4 months9 
Acute: Up to 4.5 mL liquid extract (equivalent to 4000 mg), once per day at the first stage of cold development9
  • Reduces the relative risk of cold development by 10-58%10,11
  • Reduces days with symptoms by 26% (1.4 days)9,12 and symptom scores by 23%13
  • 52% fewer patients requiring concomitant use of aspirin, paracetamol, or ibuprofen9
  • Reduces the incidence of cumulative viral infections by 26% and recurring infections by 59%, including influenza virus and parainfluenza virus9
  • Increases associated counts for white blood cells, monocytes, neutrophils, and natural killer cells, and suppresses superoxide production in the later-phase of the cold by neutrophils14

American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius)
​
400 mg, once per day, minimum 8-16 weeks in healthy adults as a preventative measure5,6,7
  • Reduces the duration of colds or acute respiratory infections by approximately 5-6 days5,7
  • Reduces the incidence of colds by 25%4, the incidence of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, and the relative risk of respiratory symptoms by 48%6,8,7
  • Reduces total symptom severity score for sore throat, runny nose, sneezing, nasal congestion, malaise, fever, headache, hoarseness, earaches, and cough6
Disclaimer
The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

Did you know we have a supplement protocol designed with the above cold and flu support topic discussed above. Check it out!

https://us.fullscript.com/protocols/spokane-wellness-immune-health-cold-and-flu-support

References
​1https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30069463
2https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23440782
3https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19592479
4https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16247099
5https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16566675
6https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14687309/
7https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024696
8https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24554461
9https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16678640
10https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17597571
11https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14748902
12https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177972
13https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515951
14https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22566526
15https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27378206
16https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775705
17https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480298
18https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888289
19https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279051
20https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17344507
21https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372900
22https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416317
23https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29077061
24https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651563
25https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20803023
26https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17352961
27https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21285968
28https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20180695
29https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18335698
0 Comments

"But doc, don't I need an x-ray before you can see me?"

1/17/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
I've heard this question asked so many times by new patients, whether it be over the phone or during the initial examination. I always try to gently explain to people that we most often can begin treatment without needing radiographic imaging. Patients understand what I'm telling them and are willing to proceed with the recommended treatment I outline not because some belief that "I'm the doctor therefore I should always be trusted" but rather because I provide my patients with evidence based clinical decision making from credible research journals, state guidelines, position statements of well-known manual therapy associations, and my own clinical experience.

Recently I was shocked to learn that an article was published titled "X-Ray Imaging is Essential for Contemporary Chiropractic and Manual Therapy Spinal Rehabilitation: Radiography Increases Benefits and Reduces Risks" by Paul A. Oakley, Jerry M. Cuttler, Deed E. Harrison. In their article the authors “encourage routine use of radiography in manual spine therapy” and opine that “radiographic imaging is necessary to deliver acceptable patient care in the practice of contemporary manual therapy of the spine.” 

This belief that routine radiographic imaging (x-ray) is necessary to deliver acceptable patient care in the practice of contemporary manual therapy or that regular imaging is needed to improve the safety of manual therapy in general or spinal manipulative therapy are not true. No reputable clinical practice guideline or high-quality evidence suggest that radiological imaging is a routine requirement for effective treatment of back pain. In fact, the opposite is often the case; when imaging is performed, there is evidence that it does not improve patient outcomes but can result in undesirable and unintended effects.

I agree that timely imaging in musculoskeletal health care is indicated by many clinical practice guidelines when clinical findings indicate suspected pathology (eg, fracture), when surgery is being considered, a patient is not responding to the standard treatment of care, or when a patient is routinely suffering the same chronic, recurring problem.

This is not just my professional opinion but that of many other colleagues of mine including, The World Federation of Chiropractic Research Council.

In Health,
Dr Jared L Wilson, DC, MS

References
1.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines (NICE). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management | Guidance and guidelines. Natl Inst Heal Care Excell; 2016. 
2.Qaseem, A, Wilt, TJ, McLean, RM, Forciea, MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514–530. doi:10.7326/M16-2367. 
3.Stochkendahl, MJ, Kjaer, P, Hartvigsen, J. National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(1):60–75. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2. 
4.Bussières, AE, Stewart, G, Al-Zoubi, F. Spinal manipulative therapy and other conservative treatments for low back pain: a guideline from the Canadian Chiropractic Guideline initiative. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;41(4):265–293. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.12.004. 
5.Ash, LM, Modic, MT, Obuchowski, NA, Ross, JS, Brant-Zawadzki, MN, Grooff, PN. Effects of diagnostic information, per se, on patient outcomes in acute radiculopathy and low back pain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(6):1098–1103. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0999. 
6.Kendrick, D, Fielding, K, Bentley, E, Miller, P, Kerslake, R, Pringle, M. The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(30):1–69. 
7.Kerry, S, Hilton, S, Dundas, D, Rink, E, Oakeshott, P. Radiography for low back pain: a randomised controlled trial and observational study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52(479):469–474. 
8.Djais, N, Kalim, H. The role of lumbar spine radiography in the outcomes of patients with simple acute low back pain. APLAR J Rheumatol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111). 2005;8:45–50. doi:10.1111/j.1479-8077.2005.00122.x.
1 Comment

Fitness versus Fatness

9/28/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
​This New Blog post from Dr. Jared Wilson, DC, MS at Gaitway Chiropractic in Spokane, Washington discusses the mortality effects of being either unfit or fat. Dr. Jared Wilson blogs about chiropractic health and other relevant health news. He is an expert in musculoskeletal injuries and functional rehab. He holds a Chiropractic Doctorate degree and a Masters of Exercise and Sports Science degree.

Last year I posted this information to the Gaitway Chiropractic facebook page and I wanted to bring it up again in this health blog.

In a recent meta-analysis (Barry et al 2014) researchers asked the question, " Which is a better predictor for death by all causes, cardiorespiratory fitness or fatness measured by one's BMI?" A meta-analysis is a study looking at a collection of other studies asking the same question in order to give a weighted average of the total effect.

They determined that:
  1. a normal weight, unfit person is 2.42 times more likely to die than a normal weight, fit person;
  2. an overweight, unfit person is 2.14 times more likely to die than a normal weight, fit person;
  3. an overweight, fit person is ONLY 1.13 times more likely to die than a normal weight, fit person;
  4. an obese, unfit person is 2.46 times more likely to die than a normal weight, fit person;
  5. and an obese, fit person is ONLY 1.21 times more likely to die than a normal weight, fit person.

Bottom line conclusion from this article I think is we should be focused more on lifestyle modifications which include an increase in physical activity to be fit. This would improve a person's cardiorespiratory fitness and perhaps we should not be focusing too much on weight loss driven approaches to health.

But let us not get carried away here. We know that being overweight and obese does increase your risk for disease. In another recent study (Vistisen et al 2014) of 6705 people, 35 to 55 years old, and an average follow up of 14 years, the researchers saw that 645 of those people developed diabetes. Of those 645 people, 94% were actually in the staying overweight group, 2% were in the progressively gaining weight group, and 4% were in the persistently obese group. The 6060 participants who remained free of diabetes were characterized by a mean BMI of just below 25 that rose only gradually over the follow-up period.

At first glance it would appear that this second study possibly contradicts the first one and that being overweight and obese should be areas of concern. However, without knowing more information about the typical eating and exercise habits of the people in the second study it is difficult to correlate the two. Perhaps those who didn't get diabetes in the second study was due to the GRADUAL rise in BMI over the 14 years. It makes me wonder if these people were engaging in regular physical activity and if the people who got diabetes were mostly sedentary people. 

Hopefully you will find this information to be informative and most importantly motivating to live a healthy life by staying active and eating well. If you have any questions about how Dr. Wilson's expertise in Chiropractic, health, or sports medicine, please call Gaitway Chiropractic in north Spokane at (509) 466-1366, request an appointment online, or come by the clinic at 8611 N Division St, Ste A, Spokane, WA 99208.

REFERENCES
Barry, Vaughn W., Meghan Baruth, Michael W. Beets, J. Larry Durstine, Jihong Liu, and Steven N. Blair. "Fitness vs. Fatness on All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis." Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 56.4 (2014): 382-90.

Vistisen, Dorte, Daniel Witte, Adam Tabak, Christian Herder, Eric Brunner, Mika Kivimaki, and Kristine Faerch. "Patterns of Obesity Development before the Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes: The Whitehall II Cohort Study." PLoS Medicine 11.2 (2014): E1001602

1 Comment

Protein Requirements for the Everyday Athlete

8/20/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
This New Blog post from Dr. Jared Wilson, DC, MS at Gaitway Chiropractic in Spokane, Washington focuses on answering the question of how much protein should an athlete intake depending on the type of exercise, their state of training, and their gender. Dr. Jared Wilson blogs about chiropractic health and other relevant health news.  He is an expert in musculoskeletal injuries and functional rehab. He holds a Chiropractic Doctorate degree and a Masters of Exercise and Sports Science degree.

Dating back as far as Ancient Greece and the Olympics, athletes have added protein to their diets to modify the effects of training on physique and performance. Conventional thought held by many athletes and coaches is that very high dietary protein intakes are needed to maximize protein metabolism within a muscle leading to faster repair and hypertrophy, the increase in cell size. But what does the current research suggest is the adequate amount of dietary protein intake for differing forms of exercise as well as the gender and performance level of the athlete?

In this blog I will try to provide the answer in a comprehensive yet simple review on this hotly debated topic.

Generally speaking, most athletes engaging in resistance exercise desire to increase their muscle mass, strength, and power. Whereas, endurance athletes are looking to augment longer duration output, such as increased maximal oxygen consumption, or reduce body fat.

Now before I jump right into discussing adequate protein intakes for resistance exercise, I want to address endurance athletes first because even these athletes need to pay attention. Multiple studies have shown that endurance exercise increases the breakdown and utilization of protein for energy as you increase the intensity of the exercise and depending on the state of training of the athlete. A recent study by McKenzie et al evaluated protein usage in both male and female athletes during a 38-day high intensity endurance training program. They found that:

  • the body used more protein at the beginning of the 38-day training compared to the end indicating the importance of knowing an athlete’s training status, 
  • the body used more protein when there was a depletion of carbohydrate availability, 
  • the body used more protein when the athletes pushed themselves to higher intensities during the workouts, 
  • on average the protein usage accounted for 1-6% of the total energy cost for the endurance workouts, and
  • women tended to use less protein then men during the workouts.

Other studies looking at athletes engaging in low to moderate intensity endurance exercise programs indicate that these athletes need the same amount of dietary protein intake or only slightly above that of a sedentary individual.

So how much protein should an athlete consume given the intensity of their endurance workouts?

Recreational endurance athletes who are exercising 4 to 5 times per week for 30 minutes below moderate to high intensities need about 0.80-1.0 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day. This is the same for sedentary men and women.

Moderate intensity endurance athletes who are exercising 4 to 5 times per week for 45 to 60 minutes need about 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.

Elite high intensity endurance athletes (regular marathon runners and triathletes) need about 1.4-1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.

And in general, dietary protein recommendations for female endurance athletes may be 10-20% lower than males.

Surprisingly, these recommended values are much lower than the average protein intakes of most male and female endurance athletes. The typical male and female endurance athlete today consumes about 1.8 and 1.3 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, respectively.

So now that I’ve summarized the adequate protein intakes for endurance athletes let’s switch to protein requirements for resistance training athletes. First off, resistance exercise is different than endurance training in that a primary end goal is muscle hypertrophy or the increase in muscle size. Therefore it would only make sense that protein intake will need to be in excess that of basic sedentary requirements to provide the building blocks for muscle repair and growth, right? Well what does the research say?

A study way back in 1988 by Tarnopolsky et al calculated how much protein intake it would take to match protein metabolism in 6 well-trained bodybuilders compared to 6 sedentary people. Surprisingly, they found that only 12% more protein intake was needed for the bodybuilders. Even more surprisingly, the bodybuilders were regularly consuming protein amounts of 2.7 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day which if you look back above you’ll find that this is 170% more the recommendations for sedentary people of 1.0 grams. (Also remember that recreational endurance athletes and sedentary individuals are at the same recommendation.)

Now this study was looking at resistance athletes at steady state given the bodybuilders had at least 2 years of consistent training. The recommended protein intake for steady state resistance athletes is 1.0-1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.

What about people in the early stages of resistance training? Do they need more or less protein intake?

4 years later Lemon et al answered this question by calculating the estimated protein requirement during the early stages of resistance training. They had 12 young men participate in 2 months of resistance training and split them into two groups having them intake either 1.4 or 2.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day. The men exercised 6 days per week for 2 hours each day. The weights were set to 70-85% the maximum weight that they could only do 1 repetition of. They found that the estimated protein requirement during this early stage of resistance training was 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.

Would you be surprised if I told you that the average resistance athlete today is consuming far more their needed protein requirements regardless of their stage of training in resistance exercise? Probably not since I’ve already told you this is true for two other situations above. The average resistance athlete today consumes 2.0 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day. This is 25% more than the amount needed for early resistance training athletes (1.6 grams) and about 80% more for steady stage resistance training athletes (1.1 grams).

At this point I might be hearing a pour of outrage from some athletes believing they still need more protein to meet the demands of their resistance training, usually from the intense football or rugby player. So let’s look at the protein requirements for football and rugby athletes involved in weight-training and high-intensity sprinting and power activities as evaluated by the research of Tarnopolsky et al in 1992. They found that the protein requirement for this group at the highest was only 1.7 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day. This is only slightly higher than those athletes who are early on in their resistance training.

So to recap, see below the listed protein requirements for the various athlete type measured in grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.

  • Sedentary people: 0.80-1.0
  • Recreational endurance: 0.80-1.0 
  • Moderate intensity endurance: 1.2 
  • Elite high intensity endurance: 1.4-1.6
  • Early stage resistance training: 1.5-1.7
  • Steady state resistance training: 1.0-1.2
  • Power sports like football or rugby: 1.4-1.7
  • Female athletes: on average need only 10-20% lower than male athletes

I know this is a lot of information but I hope you found this blog to be informative. Perhaps you will save some money on protein supplements or foods by knowing these recommendations. If you have any questions about how Dr. Wilson’s expertise in sports medicine could help you or have other Chiropractic questions, please call Gaitway Chiropractic in north Spokane at (509) 466-1366, request an appointment online, or come by the clinic at 8611 N Division St, Ste A, Spokane, WA 99208.

REFERENCES

Lemon PW, Tarnopolsky MA, MacDougall JD, Atkinson SA. Protein requirements and muscle mass/strength changes during intensive training in novice bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol 1992;73:767-75.

McKenzie S, Phillips SM, Carter Sl, Lowther S, Gibala MJ, Tarnopolsky MA. Endurance exercise training attenuates leucine oxidation and BCOAD activation during exercise in humans. Am J Physiol endocrinol Metab 2000; 278:E580-7.

Tarnopolsky MA, MacDougall JD, Atkinson SA. Influence of protein intake and training status on nitrogen balance and lean body mass. J Appl Physiol 1988;64:187-93.

Tarnopolsky MA, Atkinson SA, MacDougall JD, Chesley A, Phillips S, Schwarcz HP. Evaluation of protein requirements for trained strength athletes. J Apply Physiol 1992;73:1986-95.

0 Comments

Gluteus Medius (hip abductor) strengthening: Resisted side-stepping

8/6/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
This New Blog post from Dr. Jared Wilson, DC, MS at Gaitway Chiropractic in Spokane, Washington looks to the research to answer if the posture or position taken when performing the resisted side-stepping exercise matters when trying to maximize gluteus medius activity and minimize tensor fascia lata (TFL) activity. Dr. Jared Wilson blogs about chiropractic health and other relevant health news.  He is an expert in musculoskeletal injuries and functional rehab. He holds a Chiropractic Doctorate degree and a Masters of Exercise and Sports Science degree.

Hip abductor weakness is a common problem with people suffering from a variety of hip conditions such as femoroacetabular impingement, iliotibial band syndrome, and patellofemoral pain. It can even contribute to chronic ankle sprains. Weakness of the gluteus medius muscle will usually cause excess compensation from the TFL. Allowing the TFL to be recruited continually can lead to gluteus medius atrophy.

Corrective exercises can increase gluteus medius strength and improve muscle firing patterns. Usually exercises involving a variation of resisted hip abduction are given. However, it is important for clinicians prescribing these exercises to be aware of excessive firing from the TFL when their patient is performing them.

A recent study by Selkowitz et al (2013) looked at gluteus medius and TFL activation during 11 different exercises. The researchers used fine-wire electromyography (EMG) to determine the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of both the gluteus medius and TFL with each exercise. Their report showcased 5 exercises that activated the gluteus maximus and medius muscles without getting as much unwanted TFL activation. Those exercises included the clam exercise, single-leg bridge, hip extension (quadruped) with knee straight and knee bent, and the resisted side-stepping exercise. Specifically regarding the resisted side-stepping exercise, they found significantly lower TFL activation (13.1% MVIC) compared to gluteus medius activation (32.2% MVIC).

Bottom line is resisted side-stepping should be included in any corrective exercise program designed to strengthen the hip abductors. But does the position or posture you take when performing the resisted side-stepping exercise matter?

A study by Berry et al (2015) addressed this question. They had all 24 participants perform the exercise with an elastic resistance band around their ankles in both standing and squatting postures. Like the Selkowitz et al study, these researchers also used fine-wire EMG to determine the MVIC of the gluteus medius and TFL. Interestingly, they found that the EMG activity of the muscles being tested were actually higher in the stance leg rather than the moving one. They also saw that the EMG activity in the gluteus medius was significantly higher in the squat position than the upright position while activity in the TFL was lower in the squat position compared to the upright position.

So to answer the question…yes! It does matter what position or posture you take when performing the resisted side-stepping exercise. Performing the resisted side-stepping exercise should be done in a squat position rather than an upright one.

But how does this happen? Willcox and Burden (2013) gave a biomechanical explanation for the decreased TFL activity in the squat position. In the squat position the center of mass of the trunk is forward compared to the hip. This creates a hip flexion position and thus reduces the need to activate more muscles involved in hip flexion. Since the TFL acts also as a hip flexor in addition to being a hip abductor, the squat position would reduce the need to activate the TFL in order to stabilize the hip and pelvis. Increased TFL activation would be counterproductive.

I hope you found this blog to be informative. If you have any questions about how chiropractic care could help you, please call Gaitway Chiropractic in north Spokane at (509) 466-1366, request an appointment online, or come by the clinic at 8611 N Division St, Ste A, Spokane, WA 99208.

REFERENCES

Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Which exercises target the gluteal muscles while minimizing activation of the tensor fascia lata? electromyographic assessment using fine-wire electrodes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(2):54-64.

Berry, Justin W., Theresa S. Lee, Hanna D. Foley, and Cara L. Lewis. "Resisted Side-Stepping: The Effect of Posture on Hip Abductor Muscle Activation." J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (2015): 1-30.

Willcox EL, Burden AM. The influence of varying hip angle and pelvis position on 531 muscle recruitment patterns of the hip abductor muscles during the clam exercise. J 532 Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(5):325-31.

Image: Photographer unknown. (2015, August 6). Participant side-stepping to the right in the squat posture [digital image]. Retrieved from http://www.jospt.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2519/jospt.2015.5888


0 Comments
<<Previous

    Dr. Jared Wilson, DC, MS

    Dr. Jared Wilson blogs about chiropractic health and other relevant health news.  He is an expert in musculoskeletal injuries and functional rehab. He holds a Chiropractic Doctorate degree and a Masters degree in Exercise and Sports Science.

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    January 2019
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015

    Categories

    All
    Deep Referred Pain

    RSS Feed

Give us a call to schedule an appointment 509-466-1366
8611 N Division St, Ste A
​Spokane Wa 99208

  • Spokane Wellness Home
  • Meet the Doctor
  • Conditions We Treat
    • Low Back Pain
    • Neck Pain
  • New Patients
  • New Patient intake form
  • Appointment Request
  • Insurance
  • Blog